Open Up Resources 6 to 8 is an excellent, discovery-based program. Teachers are expected to guide students in building deep conceptual knowledge and connections between concepts and representations. Students engage in productive struggle through task based discovery. This curriculum provides students with opportunities to engage in academic discussion and discovery with peers. Choosing this program will require a full commitment to discussion and discovery and open-ended assessments.
Item | 3 - Extensive | 2 - Adequate | 1 - Inadequate | 0 - None | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitive Materials and Prohibited Submission 53G-10-103, R277-628 | This item has not been graded. | |||||
Prohibited discriminatory practices 53G-2-103-5, 53B-1-118 and 67-27-107 | This item has not been graded. | |||||
Maintaining constitutional freedom in the public schools. 53G-10-202 | This item has not been graded. | |||||
Free from advertising, e-commerce, or political interest | This item has not been graded. | |||||
Item | 3 - Extensive | 2 - Adequate | 1 - Inadequate | 0 - None | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-negotiable materials must focus coherently on the Major Work of the grade in a way that is consistent with the progressions in the standards. | Student and teachers using the materials as designed devote the majority of time to the Major Work of the grade. | Supporting Work enhances focus and coherence simultaneously by also engaging students in the Major Work of the grade. | Materials follow the grade-by-grade progressions in the Standards. Content from previous or future grades does not unduly interfere. | Lessons that only include mathematics from previous grades are clearly identified. | ||
Aligns with state standards and focuses student effort on the core learning of the grade level. |
Item | 3 - Extensive | 2 - Adequate | 1 - Inadequate | 0 - None | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The materials support the development of students’ conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
This is the core strength of this program. OpenUp has taken the goal of building conceptual understanding and designed every aspect of the program to support that goal. Where other programs use artificial "real world" scripted problems in an attempt recycle old strategies, OpenUp uses wide open spaces on the page and open questions to ask, "what do you know?" | ||||||
The materials are designed so that students attain the fluencies and procedural skills required by the Standards. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
This is the weaker aspect of this program. As noted above, the entire program is built around the idea that conceptual understanding is preferable to procedural fluency in terms of where instruction should focus. Students are given 4 to 6 problems as daily practice. These problems focus on understanding of major concepts and a brief review from prior learning. Those who want lots of practice opportunities and sample problems should look elsewhere or explore additional resources to supplement curriculum. | ||||||
The materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with applications, without losing focus on the Major Work of each grade. (Are there single and multi-step contextual problems that develop the mathematics of the grade, afford opportunities for practice, and engage students in problem solving?) | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
Each lesson is typically broken into three parts. The first portion is the warm up for the day which often includes a brief review of skills students will need in the lesson or is a brief introduction to the concept this lesson will cover. The second part of the lesson is where the major concept or skill for the day is introduced. This is typically one problem that has various associated questions. The third part of the lesson is typically a smaller application or in support of the concept/topic of the lesson. Students then have a Cool Down which is a 1-2 question prompt that summarizes the main objective for the lesson. There is a nice balance where most of the work is on conceptual understanding, while each lesson has at least some application problems. |
Item | 3 - Extensive | 2 - Adequate | 1 - Inadequate | 0 - None | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Materials address the practice standards in such a way as to enrich the Major Work of the grade; practice standards strengthen the focus on Major Work instead of detracting from it, in both teacher and student materials. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
By having open-ended work, and even open-ended assessment, students are encouraged to respond with what they know instead of placing the focus on what they don't know. This is frankly a beautiful way to teach and learn math where student thinking is honored and used as the raw materials for instruction. | ||||||
Tasks and assessments of student learning are designed to provide evidence of students’ proficiency in the Standards of Mathematical Practice. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
Tasks and assessments allow students to show how much of the concept they have mastered. Rubrics are included to allow teachers to assess the depth of a student's understanding. They are rated on a 1 to 4 point scale with 4 demonstrating the greatest depth of mastery. | ||||||
Materials support the Standards’ emphasis on mathematical reasoning. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
The entire program is built to optimize mathematical reasoning. See other sections for details. |
Item | 3 - Extensive | 2 - Adequate | 1 - Inadequate | 0 - None | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support for English Language learners and other special populations is thoughtful (evidence-based) and helps those students meet the same Standards (and rigor) as all other students. The language in which problems are posed is carefully considered. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
Lessons that are discussion and exploration based give all students a chance to contribute what they know. Open-ended assessments and tasks also encourage students to use what representations and strategies they wish to try to advance their progress on a task. Since much of this allows for visual representations, students learning English, or those with learning disabilities should have better success with this kind of program. Where there might be more difficulty is this students on the autism spectrum where the plethora of choices or no incorrect answer could be a barrier. Teachers skilled in working with such students would need to accommodate, perhaps by limited the range of response types, or providing other means of adding structure for those students. | ||||||
Materials provide scaffolding, differentiation, intervention, and support for a broad range of learners with gradual removal of supports, when needed, to allow students to demonstrated their mathematical understanding independently. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
This work is largely left to teachers (rather than the printed materials) with extensive guides to teachers on how to structure questions and help for struggling students. Each lesson provides ideas for EL and special population learners. Sentence frames and additional scaffolds or supports are often included in teacher materials. | ||||||
Design of lessons incorporates strategies such as using multiple representations, deconstructing/reconstructing the language of problems, providing suggestions for addressing common student difficulties, etc. to ensure grade-level progress for all learners. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
This is another core strength of this program. Multiple representations are encouraged (or required!) in most tasks and assessments. Providing open-ended answer fields allows students who are below grade-level to bring what knowledge they have to bear on the tasks at hand. | ||||||
Ethnic Studies- (Ethnic studies in core standards and curriculum should be a narrowly tailored incorporation of age-appropriate opportunities that naturally arise through education without pretextual effort in courses, programs, or activities where ethnic studies is not a primary focus. The material should incorporate a curriculum of people and cultures that reflect the state’s various demographics without commentary that seeks to violate the neutrality standard established in codes: 53B-1-118, 53G-2-103, 53G-2-104, 53G-2-105, 67-27-107, | This item has not been graded. | |||||
Shared Values and Character Traits | This item has not been graded. | |||||
Item | 3 - Extensive | 2 - Adequate | 1 - Inadequate | 0 - None | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple measurements of individual student progress occur at regular intervals ensuring success of all students. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
Student work should be assessed regularly, but this requires more teacher work than in an automated quiz platform. Teachers should be circulating during discussions and tasks and assessing, at least informally, and providing constructive hints or questions. The program does not rely on a self-grading quiz platform to build fluency with procedural problems. Teachers are given a detailed rubric based on a scale of 1 to 4 to assess each student's level of understanding based on their response to a given prompt. | ||||||
Assessments measure what students understand and can do through well designed mathematical tasks and applications. | Meets | Partially meets | N/A | Does not meet | ||
These are very well-designed tasks that foster both deep understanding, and student courage. For teachers ready to put their whole focus on deep understanding, this program has ideal assessments. |
250 East 500 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-3204
Phone: 801.538.7807