This microcredential represents a teacher’s ability to understand and respond to progressions related to algebraic properties and conjectures by planning and implementing instruction based on the Standards for Mathematical Practice and Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices. It involves selecting, using, and adapting mathematics curricula and teaching materials, including the integration of mathematical tools and technology, as well as using and analyzing formative and summative assessments to determine where students are in learning of algebraic properties and conjectures. This is the second of three microcredentials in the Elementary Mathematics Endorsement: Algebraic Reasoning Stack. These microcredentials can be earned in any order.
To earn this microcredential you will need to collect and submit two sets of evidence demonstrating your understanding of algebraic properties and conjectures. You will also complete a short written or video reflective analysis.
In algebra, students need opportunities to experience math in context and to notice patterns as they occur. Once they notice these patterns, students should have the opportunity to make and prove conjectures. These experiences help students become mathematical thinkers and investigators rather than just “doers.” Proving these conjectures as either true or false allows students to make connections to and find meaning for existing rules. The proficiencies contained in this microcredential includes several competencies.
Teachers should understand:
A conjecture is a mathematical statement that has not yet been rigorously proved. Conjectures arise when one notices a pattern that holds true for many cases. However, just because a pattern holds true for many cases does not mean that the pattern will hold true for all cases. Conjectures must be proved for the mathematical observation to be fully accepted. When a conjecture is rigorously proved, it becomes a theorem.
Ms. Blaisdell and her fourth-grade students are working with multiplication. She wants them to understand that using the commutative property can make solving multiplication problems easier. She knows, however, that if she just tells her students about the commutative property, this limits their understanding. Instead, she starts to give them activities to notice the commutative property. As the students are working on the activities, one student notices that 3 x 5 has the same product as 5 x 3. This student says that “If you flip the order of the numbers, the answer is the same.” Mrs. Blaisdell asks the students if this is always true in multiplication. She and the students set about trying to prove whether this conjecture always works. They try many different scenarios and determine that the order of the factors in multiplication doesn’t affect the product. They are comfortable with this conclusion. Mrs. Blaisdell connects what students discover to the commutative property of multiplication.
Submit the TWO evidence options below to demonstrate your effective use of algebraic properties and conjectures in your instruction.
Observe a teacher in your building teaching a math concept where conjectures will be formed and tested, leading to student understanding of a rule or property. This focused observation will take place in three parts: before, during, and after.
Before the observation, preconference with the cooperating teacher. The discussion should cover: (a) What proficiency in the standard being observed looks like for students. (b) Background information about what the teacher has already done to help students gain conceptual understanding. (c) How the teacher is planning to help students form and test conjectures during the lesson. (d) What misconceptions and barriers the teacher anticipates students having. (e) Include these interview notes in your submission.
During the lesson, do the following: (a) Take notes on what students are doing. (b) Take notes on what conjectures students are making. (c) Take notes on what students are understanding. (d) Take notes on what students don’t seem to be understanding. (e) Take notes on what students are doing to test the conjecture they’ve made. (f) Include these notes in your submission.
After the lesson, complete a written reflection on the lesson. Specifically include thoughts about the following: (a) Pieces of the lesson that helped students develop understanding. (b) Ideas on how you might be able to help students who aren’t understanding. (c) How his grade level's standard connects to your standards. (d) Include these notes in your submission.
Submit a video demonstrating your implementation of a lesson focused on helping students understand a mathematical rule or property (the commutative property of addition, for example). Your lesson should clearly show how students were given opportunities to form and test a conjecture about the desired rule and how their conclusion was connected to the actual rule or property.
Showcase teacher facilitation of helping students form and test conjectures to understand a mathematical property or rule. Video requirements:
Criterion 1: Evidence demonstrates a clear content understanding that helps students move from conceptual understanding to procedural fluency.
Criterion 2: Evidence demonstrates the candidate's understanding of algebraic properties and conjectures.
Criterion 3: Evidence demonstrates the understanding of and use of effective teaching practices designed to help students understand algebraic properties and conjectures.
When you provide students with the opportunity to form conjectures and prove/disprove these conjectures, what effect does this have on their long-term mastery of the rule/property being explored? Use evidence to support your thoughts.
When you provide students with the opportunity to form conjectures and prove/disprove these conjectures, what effect does this have on their identities as math learners? Use evidence to support your thoughts.
Looking ahead, what changes could you make to your practice to help students become proficient in your standards focused on algebraic properties and conjectures.
Criterion 1: The reflection indicates that the educator understands the importance of students forming and proving conjectures and linking this process to existing rules and properties and the impact this practice would have on student learning.
Criterion 2: The reflection discusses changes the teacher could make to their practice to help students become proficient in standards focused on algebraic properties and conjectures.
The Utah effective Teaching Standards articulate what effective teaching and learning look like in the Utah public education system.
These eight mathematics teaching practices provide a framework for strengthening the teaching and learning of mathematics. This research-informed framework of teaching and learning reflects the current learning principles as well as other knowledge of mathematics teaching that has accumulated over the last two decades. In essence, these teaching practices represent a core set of high-leverage practices and essential teaching skills necessary to promote deep learning of mathematics.
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally illustrates how children learn mathematics, and then shows teachers the most effective methods of teaching PreK-8 math through hands-on, problem-based activities.
The Utah State Board of Education adopted the K-12 Utah Core Standards for Mathematics in January 2016. Core guides provide a description of the Core Standards, including concepts and skills to master, critical background knowledge and academic vocabulary. The course overview documents show the major work of the grade level and the coherence of content across grade levels.
Teaching Student-Centered Mathematics Grades K-3 provides practical guidance along with proven strategies for practicing teachers of kindergarten through grade 3. This volume offers brand-new material specifically written for the early grades.
This book connects the foundations of teaching elementary math and the “why” behind procedures, formulas, and reasoning so students gain a deeper understanding to bring into their own classrooms. Through her text, Beckmann teaches mathematical principles while addressing the realities of being a teacher.
The Common Core State Standards in mathematics were built on progressions: narrative documents describing the progression of a topic across a number of grade levels, informed both by research on children's cognitive development and by the logical structure of mathematics.
Elementary Mathematics is Anything but Elementary: Content and Methods From a Developmental Perspective is a comprehensive program that delivers both a content and a methods text. Serving as a professional development guide for both pre-service and in-service teachers, this text''s integrated coverage helps dissolve the line between content and methods--and consequently bolsters teachers'' confidence in their delivery of math instruction. A strong emphasis on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics five core standards provides key information common to most state curricula relative to NCTM standards for pre-K through sixth grade. In addition, text content is based on thorough elementary mathematical scope and sequences that have been shown to be an effective means for guiding the delivery of curriculum and instruction.
With this resource, new and experienced teachers alike will focus on the big ideas and practices in mathematics, deepening their own understanding and content knowledge, learn how to teach those big ideas using a student-centered, problem-solving approach, and anticipate student thinking and explore effective tools, models, and rich mathematical questions that nudge student thinking forward.
250 East 500 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-3204